Gene Ther Mol Biol Vol
10, 71-94, 2006
Design
of functional dendritic polymers for application as drug and gene delivery
systems
Zili Sideratou, Leto-Aikaterini
Tziveleka, Christina Kontoyianni, Dimitris Tsiourvas, Constantinos
M. Paleos*
Institute of Physical Chemistry, NCSR “Demokritos”, 15310 Aghia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece ________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Constantinos M. Paleos, Institute of
Physical Chemistry, NCSR "Demokritos"; 15310 Aghia Paraskevi, Attiki,
Greece; Tel.: +30 210 6503666; Fax: +30 210 6529792; e-mail: paleos@chem.demokritos.gr
Key words: Dendrimers, Hyperbranched Polymers, Dendritic
Polymers, Nanocarriers, Drug Delivery System, Gene
Delivery
Abbreviations:
Adriamycin, (ADR); arginine-grafted-PAMAM dendrimer,
(PAMAM-Arg); Asialo-glycoprotein, (ASGP); betamethasone dipropionate, (BD);
betamethasone valerate, (BV); Boron Neutron Capture Therapy, (BNCT);
diaminobutane
poly(propylene imine) dendrimer, (DAB); diaminobutane poly(propylene imine)
fourth generation dendrimer functionalized with 6 guanidinium groups, (DAB-G6
); diaminobutane poly(propylene imine) fourth generation dendrimer
functionalized with 12 guanidinium groups, (DAB-G12); Dynamic Light Scattering,
(DLS); epidermal growth factor, (EGF); green fluorescent protein, (GFP);
injected dose, (ID); hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine), (PEI); hyperbranched
polyglycerol, (PG); Isothermal Titration Calorimety, (ITC); L-lysine
grafted-PAMAM dendrimer, (PAMAM-Lys); methotrexate, (MTX); methoxypoly(ethylene
glycol)-isocyanate, (PEG-isocyanate); PEGylated diaminobutane poly(propylene
imine) dendrimer with 4 PEG chains, (DAB-4PEG); PEGylated
diaminobutane poly(propylene
imine) dendrimer with 8 PEG chains, (DAB-8PEG); PEGylated polyglycerol,
(PG-PEG); PEGylated-Folate polyglycerol, (PG-PEG-Folate); Phosphate Buffer
Saline, (PBS); poly(amidoamine) dendrimer, (PAMAM); poly(amidoamine) dendrimer
with terminal hydroxyl groups, (PAMAM-OH); poly(ethylene imine)-poly(ethylene
glycol)-folate, (PEI-PEG-FOL); poly(ethylene glycol), (PEG); poly(ethylene
glycol) monomethyl ether, (M-PEG); poly(propylene imine) dendrimer, (PPI);
primaquine phosphate, (PP); pyrene, (PY); quaternized poly(amidoamine)
dendrimer with terminal hydroxyl groups, (QPAMAM-OH); tamoxifen,
(TAM)
Summary
The present review deals with the design
and preparation of functional and multifunctional dendrimeric and hyperbranched
polymers (dendritic polymers), in order to be employed as drug and gene
delivery systems. In particular, using as starting materials known and
well-characterized basic dendritic polymers, the review discusses the kind of
structural modifications that these polymers were subjected for preparing
nanocarriers of low toxicity, high encapsulating capacity, specificity to
certain biological cells and transport ability through their membranes. Due to
the great number of external groups of dendritic polymers either
functionalization or multifunctionalization can occur, providing products that
fulfill one or more of the requirements that an effective drug carrier should
exhibit. A common feature of these dendritic polymers is the exhibition of the
so-called polyvalent interactions, while for the multifunctional derivatives a
number of targeting ligands determines specificity, other groups secure
stability in biological milieu, while others facilitate their transport through
cell membranes. In addition, for gene delivery applications these
multifunctional systems should be or become cationic in the biological
environment for the formation of complexes with the negatively charged genetic
material.
Dendrimers
are prepared by tedious synthetic procedures (Bosman et al, 1999; Schlüter
and Rabe, 2000; Fréchet and Tomalia, 2001; Newkome et al, 2001) and they
are nanometer-sized, highly branched and monodisperse macromolecules with
symmetrical architecture. They consist of a central core, branching units and
terminal functional groups. The core and the internal units determine the
environment of the nanocavities and consequently their solubilizing or
encapsulating properties, whereas, the external groups their solubility and
chemical behaviour. On the other hand, hyperbranched polymers (Inoue, 2000),
including the extensively investigated hyperbranched polyether polyols or
polyglycerols (Sunder et al, 1999a, b; 2000a,b; Haag, 2001; Frey and
Haag, 2002;
Siegers et al, 2004) are conveniently prepared. Hyperbranched polymers are
non-symmetrical, highly branched and polydispersed macromolecules, while their
main structural feature, also common to dendrimers, is that they exhibit
nanocavities. These two types of polymers are called dendritic polymers the
nanocavities of which, depending on their polarity, can encapsulate various
molecules, including active drug ingredients. The external groups of dendritic
polymers can be modified providing a diversity of functional materials
(Vögtle et al, 2000) that can be employed for various
applications.
Within this context, commercially available
or custom-made dendrimeric or hyperbranched polymers can be functionalized for
being used as effective systems for drug (Liu and Fréchet, 1999; De
Jess et al, 2002; Stiriba et al, 2002; Beezer et al, 2003; Gillies and
Fréchet, 2005) and gene (Bielinska et al, 1999; Luo et al, 2002; Ohsaki
et al, 2002) delivery. Since more than one type of groups can be introduced at
the surface of the dendritic polymers, these systems are characterized as
multifunctional as shown in Figure 1. Each type of groups plays a specific role in the
application of multifunctional dendritic polymers as drug delivery systems.
Thus, specificity for certain cells can be accomplished by attaching targeting
ligands at the surface of dendritic polymers, while enhanced solubility,
decreased toxicity, biocompatibity, stability and protection in the biological
milieu can be achieved by the functionalization of the end groups of dendritic
polymers, for instance, with poly(ethylene glycol) chains (PEG). The function
of PEG-chains is crucial for modifying the behaviour of drug themselves or of
their carriers (Noppl-Simson and Needham, 1996; Ishiwata et al, 1997;
Liu et al,
1999; Liu et al, 2000; Veronese, 2001; Roberts et al, 2002; Pantos et al, 2004;
Vandermeulen and Klok, 2004).
Targeting
ligands are complementary to cell receptors (Cooper, 1997; Lodish et al, 2000)
and induce the attachment of the nanocarrier to the cell surface. This binding
is further enhanced due to the so-called polyvalent interactions (Mammen et al,
1998; Kitov and Bundle, 2003) attributed to the close proximity of the
recognizable ligands on the limited surface area of the dendritic molecules. On
the other hand, as it has long been established with liposomes (Lasic and
Needham, 1995; Crosasso et al, 2000; Needham and Kim, 2000; Silvander et al,
2000), PEG-chains may prolong the circulation of liposomes in biological
milieu. Transport through the cell membrane can also be facilitated by the
introduction of appropriate moieties at the surface of the dendritic polymers.
In addition, modification of the internal groups of dendrimers affects their
solubilizing character, making, therefore, possible the encapsulation of a
diversity of drugs. In this connection, cationization of dendrimers, and
particularly of their external groups, facilitates their application as gene
transfer agents (Bielinska et al, 1999; Luo et al, 2002; Ohsaki et al, 2002)
due to formation of DNA-Dendritic Polymer complexes.
Monofunctional dendritic drug carriers do not simultaneously show the desired properties that multifunctional derivatives exhibit. Thus, in this review, starting from selected monofunctional systems and specifically from the dendrimeric compounds poly(amidoamine), PAMAM, and diaminobutane poly(propylene imine), DAB, and also from the hyperbranched polymers polyglycerol, PG and poly(ethylene imine), PEI, (Figure 2) a stepwise design of multifunctional systems will be discussed, aiming at obtaining appropriate nanocarriers for drug delivery and gene transfection. This review is by no means exhaustive and only selected examples will be discussed highlighting on work performed recently in our laboratory. The objective of this review is to illustrate the effectiveness of the strategy of molecular engineering, applied on dendritic surfaces, to prepare drug carriers with desired properties.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of a
multifunctional dendrimer.

Figure 2. Chemical structure of dendrimeric
compounds.
II. Drug carriers: from monofunctional
to multifunctional dendrimers
In an example on molecular engineering of
PAMAM surface, poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether (M-PEG), having an
average molecular weight of 550 or 2000, was attached at the terminal amino
groups of the third and fourth generation polymers as shown in
Figure 3. Inside the nanocavities of the
so-prepared PEGylated dendrimers, Adriamycin, ADR, or Methotrexate, MTX,
anticancer drugs (Figure 4)
were encapsulated (Kojima et al, 2000). As the amount of ADR employed for
encapsulation inside these PEGylated dendrimers increased, the number of ADR
molecules associated with the dendrimer increased and finally reached a
plateau. Depending on the generation, the maximum number of ADR molecules
encapsulated per dendrimer i.e. by the M-PEG(550)-G3, M-PEG(2000)-G3,
M-PEG(550)-G4, and M-PEG(2000)-G4 dendrimeric derivatives are ca. 1.2, 2.3,
1.6, and 6.5, respectively, as shown in Figure 5. Thus, the encapsulation ability varied for these
PEG-dendrimers and it was found to depend on the molecular weight of PEG-chains
and also on dendrimers’ generation.
PAMAM has a
basic interior and, therefore, it is possible to encapsulate MTX, which is
acidic, since it bears two carboxyl groups. The number of MTX molecules
associated with one dendrimer molecule, as a function of the MTX/dendrimer
ratio during loading is shown in Figure 6. As it was observed in the

Figure 3. Preparation and structure of M-PEG PAMAM
dendrimer of the third generation. Reproduced from Kojima et al, 2000 with kind
permission from the authors and American Chemical
Society.

Figure 4. Chemical structure of the anticancer drugs
adriamycin, ADR, and Methotrexate, MTX

Figure 5. Encapsulation of ADR by M-PEG(550)-attached (open symbols) or M-PEG(2000)-attached (closed symbols) PAMAM G3 (¡,=) and G4 (ê,s) dendrimers. The number of ADR encapsulated per dendrimer is shown as a function of the ADR/dendrimer molar ratio during loading. Reproduced from Kojima et al, 2000 with kind permission from American Chemical Society.

Figure 6. Encapsulation of MTX by M-PEG(550)-attached
(open symbols) or M-PEG(2000)-attached (closed symbols) PAMAM G3 (¡,=)
and G4 (ê, s) dendrimers. The number of MTX encapsulated
per dendrimer is shown as a function of the MTX/dendrimer molar ratio during
loading. Reproduced from Kojima et al, 2000 with kind permission from American
Chemical Society.
encapsulation of
ADR, the number of MTX molecules associated with the modified dendrimer
increased with increasing amount of MTX employed during loading, and finally
reached a constant value. The maximum numbers of MTX molecules associated with
the M-PEG(550)-G3, M-PEG(2000)-G3, M-PEG(550)-G4, and M-PEG(2000)-G4 dendrimers
are approximately 10, 13, 20, and 26 mol/mol of dendrimer, respectively.
Apparently, the number of the encapsulated drugs by the PEGylated dendrimers
increased when MTX was used instead of ADR. Since these drugs have similar
molecular weights, this result suggests that the electrostatic interaction from
the acid-base interaction between the dendrimer and MTX molecules results in an
enhanced encapsulation of MTX by these dendrimers. As it was the case with ADR
encapsulation, the number of MTX encapsulated by the dendrimer was affected
both by generation of the PAMAM and by the chain length of the
M-PEG.
Release
experiments performed in PBS buffer (Phosphate Buffer Saline) showed that ADR
was readily released from the modified dendrimers. Apparently,
hydrophobic interaction
between ADR and the dendrimer is not strong enough to retain the drug in the
interior of the PAMAM dendrimeric moiety. The release of MTX from the
M-PEG-functionalized dendrimers was also investigated by the same method. The
time dependency of MTX concentration in the outer phase during the dialysis is
shown in Figure 7.
Apparently, the MTX concentration in the outer phase increased at a slower rate
when MTX was encapsulated in the M-PEG-attached dendrimer than in the case of
free MTX. This indicates that MTX was gradually released from the modified
dendrimer. As mentioned above, MTX was electrostatically bound to the
dendrimeric interior and, therefore, dissociation of MTX from the dendrimer was
suppressed to some extent. However, when the dialysis was performed in the
presence of 150 mM NaCl, no difference in the release rate was observed between
MTX encapsulated in the M-PEG-attached dendrimer and free MTX. In this case,
MTX can dissociate readily from the dendrimer because the
electrostatic interaction
is weakened by the shielding effect of Na+ and Cl-
(Kojima et al, 2000).
Effective
solubilization of hydrophobic drugs was, however, achieved with another
PEGylated dendrimeric system (Sideratou et al, 2001), which is analogous to the
one previously discussed. PEGylation of dendrimers was performed under facile
experimental conditions by the interaction of methoxypoly(ethylene
glycol)-isocyanate (PEG-isocyanate) with the external primary amino groups of
DAB dendrimers of fifth generation, as shown in Figure 8. Two different PEGylated dendrimeric derivatives were
prepared i.e. the DAB-4PEG (weakly PEGylated) and DAB‑8PEG (densely
PEGylated). In this manner, the role of PEG-coating on encapsulation and
release properties was possible to be assessed.
Comparison
of solubilizing ability of the parent and PEGylated DAB dendrimers is
shown in Table
1. For this purpose, betamethasone
valerate, BV, and betamethasone dipropionate, BD, were used as active drug
ingredients (Figure 9). These
anti-inflammatory corticosteroids are practically water insoluble and it is,
therefore, necessary to encapsulate these compounds in a water-soluble carrier
for facilitating their use as drugs. The concentration of encapsulated
betamethasone derivatives was significantly increased in PEGylated dendrimers.
Thus, for DAB-8PEG the loading was 13 and 7 wt.% for BV and BD, while for
DAB-4PEG was 6 and 4 wt.%, respectively. The observed solubility increase was
attributed to an additional solubilization of the compounds in PEG-chains by
which the dendrimers are coated. This is also verified by the fact that upon
protonation they remain solubilized in PEG-chains environment. As expected, by
increasing dendrimer concentration, solubilization of drugs analogously
increases to a certain limit.

Figure 7. Release of MTX from the M-PEG(2000)-attached G4 dendrimer. The MTX-loaded M-PEG(2000)-G4 dendrimer (¡, =) or free MTX (ê, s) dissolved in 1 mM Tris-HCl-buffered solution (pH 7.4) containing (open symbols) or not containing (closed symbols) 150 mM NaCl and dialyzed against the same solution. The time course of MTX concentration in the outer phase during the dialysis is shown in the figure. Reproduced from Kojima et al, 2000 with kind permission from American Chemical Society.

Figure 8. Preparation and structure of PEGylated DAB
dendrimer of the fifth generation functionalized with 4 or 8 PEG
chains.
In another recent report, extending the previous work, a novel multifunctional dendrimeric carrier was designed (Paleos et al, 2004) based on diaminobutane poly(propylene imine) dendrimer of the fifth generation. The synthetic procedure of this derivative is shown in Figure 11. This carrier is intended to simultaneously address issues such as stability in the biological milieu, targeting and very possibly transport through cell membranes. For this purpose, in addition to surface protective poly(ethylene glycol) chains, guanidinium moieties were introduced as targeting ligands. In addition, the accumulation of guanidinium groups at the surface of the dendrimer may also facilitate its transport ability. The functional groups were covalently attached at the dendrimeric surface and it was possible to secure, in principle, desired drug delivery properties due to: a. Protection of the carrier because of the coverage of the dendrimeric surface with poly(ethylene glycol) chains, b. Recognition ability towards complementary moieties; surface guanidinium groups secure the facile interaction with acidic receptors including the biologically significant carboxylate and phosphate groups. Combined electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonding are exercised making this interaction thermodynamically favorable (Hirst et al, 1992), c. Possibility of encapsulation and release of active drug ingredients from the nanocavities, which can be tuned by environmental changes (Sideratou et al, 2001), d. Complexation with DNA for gene therapy applications, e. The occurrence of polyvalency interactions, associated with enhanced binding, due to the accumulation of recognizable moieties on the limited surface area of the dendrimer as schematically illustrated in Figure 12, f. The expected decrease of toxicity due to the facile modification of the toxic amino groups (Malik et al, 2000).
Table
1. Comparative solubility of pyrene (PY), betamethasone
valerate (BV) and betamethasone dipropionate (BD) in parent DAB and PEGylated
derivatives. Reproduced from Sideratou et al, 2001 with kind permission from
Elsevier.
|
Compound |
[dendrimer]/M |
[PY]/M |
[BV]/M |
[BD]/M |
|
DAB |
5
x 10-5 |
2.15
x 10-6 |
2.95
x 10-5 |
1.84
x 10-5 |
|
DAB-8PEG |
5
x 10-5 |
5.40
x 10-5 |
3.85
x 10-4 |
2.56
x 10-4 |
|
DAB-4PEG |
5
x 10-5 |
2.14
x 10-5 |
2.05
x 10-4 |
1.25
x 10-4 |
|
DAB-8PEG |
5
x 10-4 |
8.75
x 10-5 |
3.65
x 10-3 |
1.87
x 10-3 |
|
DAB-4PEG |
5
x 10-4 |
5.25
x 10-5 |
1.70
x 10-3 |
1.09
x 10-3 |

Figure
9.
Chemical
structure of betamethasone valerate, BV, and
betamethasone dipropionate, BD

Figure 10.
Schematic representation of the solubilization of
pyrene in PEGylated dendrimers. Reproduced from Sideratou et
al, 2001 with kind permission from Elsevier BV.

Figure 11. Reaction scheme for the synthesis of a multifunctional
dendrimeric derivative. Reproduced
from Paleos et al, 2004 with kind permission from American Chemical
Society.

Figure 12. Schematic representation of a dendrimer exhibiting polyvalent properties
For
evaluating the loading capacity and release properties of the above
multifunctional dendrimer, pyrene (PY) and betamethasone valerate (BV), were
used as model compounds. The dendrimeric derivative encapsulated significantly
higher concentrations of the above compounds compared to the parent dendrimer,
as determined by UV spectroscopy and shown in Table 2.
This is particularly significant for betamethasone valerate, of which seven
molecules are solubilized per dendrimeric molecule. As previously mentioned
(Sideratou et al, 2001), this was attributed to the presence PEG-chains.
Additionally, in the case of betamethasone valerate the loading capacity is 11 wt% for the multifunctional dendrimer, i.e.
almost double compared to the loading capacity of the simply PEGylated
dendrimer (6 wt%) and more than five times compared to the loading capacity of
the parent dendrimeric solution (1.7 wt %) (Sideratou et al, 2001). This is
quite beneficial for its use as drug delivery system and it can only be
attributed to the other two functional groups introduced at the surface of the
multifunctional derivative. As it will be discussed below, they may act
synergistically enhancing solubilization of betamethasone valerate.
The
release of the active ingredient from the dendrimer when it reaches the target
site enhances its bioavailability and efficacy. In addition, drug release from
endosomal compartment appears a limiting factor for several targeted drug
delivery formulations (Boomer et al, 2003). These requirements impose the need
for developing drug delivery systems in which the release of drug can be
triggered by appropriate stimulus. For this purpose pH-triggered, enzymatic,
thermal and photochemically induced processes have been reported (Boomer et al,
2003). For instance low pH within endosomal and ischemic
tissue environments renders acid triggerable delivery systems attractive for
controlled release.
The
multifunctional poly(propylene imine) dendrimers prepared, due to the presence
of tertiary amino groups in their core fulfill at least one of these
requirements, i.e. being pH responsive (Sideratou et al,
2000; Sideratou et al, 2001; Paleos et al, 2004). As found in the previous
experiment pyrene is solubilized in the interior of dendrimer and also within
PEG chains, while upon protonation of tertiary amines of the nanocavities
pyrene is repositioned in the PEG coat.
For
achieving the release of the encapsulated pyrene from the PEG protective coat
another method has, therefore, to be explored. We were prompted to
use aqueous sodium
chloride solution for triggering pyrene release since, as it has been
established in independent studies (Wang et al, 2000; Bogan and Agnes, 2002),
ions of alkali metals cationize poly(ethylene glycol) moieties through
complexation. The designed multifunctional dendrimer, due to the attachment of
PEG chains at its surface, is susceptible to analogous interactions and,
therefore, it could be possible for metal cations to replace solubilized pyrene
releasing it to the bulk aqueous phase. Indeed, by titrating dendrimeric
solutions with sodium chloride solution, pyrene was released and dispersed in
the bulk solution in the form of crystallites. The isolated crystallites were
indentified by 1H NMR and proved to be pure
pyrene.
The
two-step triggered release from the multifunctional dendrimer was also
investigated using the lipophilic drug betamethasone valerate. Release of the
drug with hydrochloric acid has not been observed since betamethasone valerate
remained solubilized within the dendrimeric environment and preferably within
the
poly(ethylene glycol) chains. Betamethasone valerate encapsulated in the
multifunctional dendrimer was completely released upon addition of sodium
chloride as shown in Figure 14. However, within the concentration
Table
2.
Comparative solubility of pyrene (PY) and betamethasone valerate (BV) in the
parent fifth generation DAB and multifunctional dendrimer. Reproduced from
Paleos et al, 2004 with kind permission from American Chemical
Society.
|
Compound |
[dendrimer]
/M |
[PY]
/M |
PY/Dendrimer
molar ratio |
[BV]
/M |
BV/Dendrimer
molar ratio |
|
DAB |
1.0
x 10-3 |
2.1±0.2
x 10-5 |
0.021±0.002 |
2.5±0.4
x 10-4 |
0.25±0.04 |
|
Multifunctional
Dendrimer |
2.5
x 10-4 |
1.9±0.08
x 10-5 |
0.076±0.002 |
1.80±0.4
x 10-3 |