Gene Ther Mol Biol Vol 10, 101-108,
2006
The
analysis of dose response curve comes in useful for the assembly of
multi-siRNAs expressing cassettes
Laura Poliseno1,
Monica Evangelista1, Mauro Giacca2 and Giuseppe
Rainaldi1,*
1Laboratory of Gene and Molecular Therapy,
Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy;
2International
Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Dr. Giuseppe Rainaldi, Laboratory of Gene and Molecular Therapy,
Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Area della Ricerca, Via Moruzzi,1, 56124
Pisa, Italy; FAX: +39 050 3153327; Tel: +39 050 3153108; E-mail:
g.rainaldi@ifc.cnr.it
Key words:
simultaneous gene expression knock-down, competition among siRNAs, multi-shRNA
vectors
Abbreviations:
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(DMEM); Fetal Bovine serum (FBS); Insulin-like growth factor I receptor
(IGF-IR); multiple cloning site (MCS); platelet-derived growth factor
receptor b (PDGF-Rb); urokinase type plasminogen activator
(uPA)
Summary
The construction of vectors that would allow the
simultaneous expression of multiple siRNAs targeted against different genes is
hampered by the competition between siRNAs. In this work, the simultaneous
knock-down of four genes involved in smooth muscle cells activation, migration
and proliferation was considered. We used the knock-down of EGFP reporter assay
to evaluate the dose response curves of the four shRNA expressing plasmids. We
found that each siRNA reached the highest acitivity (as evaluated from the
plateau phase) with different kinetics (as evaluated from the KD). Due the
specificity of KD, the mono-specific plasmids were tested against their targets
by the addiction of saturating amounts of each of the other shRNA-expressing
plasmid. In this way, stronger from weaker shRNAs were distinguished and KD
seemed to account for it. Moreover, when stronger shRNAs were assembled, the
resulting plasmid was able to simultaneously transcribe active shRNAs genes.
These results indicate that expression cassettes for different siRNAs having
similar KD can be efficiently and rapidly assembled into multi-specific
multi-siRNA plasmids. A practical correlate of these observations is that, in
order to obtain effective multi-gene knock down, only siRNAs with similar
inhibitory kinetics need to be delivered to the
cells.
I.
Introduction
Since the demonstration that
synthetic siRNAs can be used to successfully knock-down gene expression,
several efforts have been made to prolong their temporally limited activity.
For this purpose, different RNA polymerase III-dependent siRNA
expression cassettes
have been developed and inserted into retroviral, lentiviral and adenoviral
vectors (Brummelkamp et al,
2002). In this context, the possibility to construct vectors for
the delivery of multiple siRNAs represents a further challenge in RNAi
applications (Elbashir et al, 2002; Leirdal and
Sioud, 2002; Anderson et al, 2003; Yu et al, 2003; Schuck et al,
2004). One of the concerns that arises when
multiple siRNAs are present inside the cells is their possible competition for
the RNAi machinery. Indeed, it has been reported that pools of active siRNAs
targeted against different regions of the same RNA do not always show
additive/synergistic effects (Holen et al, 2002; Kawasaki et al,
2003; Hsieh et al, 2004) and that inactive siRNAs
decrease the efficiency of active ones (McManus et al, 2002; Wunsche and
Sczakiel, 2005).
Hence, the construction
of vectors that would allow either the expression of shRNA targeted against
different regions of the same gene, in order to increase target gene knock-down
efficiency, or the simultaneous expression of multiple siRNAs targeted against
different genes is highly dependent on the competition between siRNAs.
Insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR), platelet-derived growth factor
receptor b (PDGF-Rb), urokinase type
plasminogen activator (uPA) and av integrin
genes are involved in the control of arterial of smooth muscle cell activation,
proliferation and migration (Kopp and de Martin,
2004). In order to achieve the simultaneous down-regulation of
these genes as a therapeutic approach for prevention of arterial restenosis, it
is crucial to know if active siRNAs targeted against these genes compete or not
with to each other. We have already identified active siRNAs against these
genes on the basis of functional asymmetry (Schwarz et al,
2003) and internal instability (Khvorova et al,
2003) and proved that they are active against their own
targets (Poliseno et al,
2004). The reasons are that the antisense strand is loaded in
RISC complex more efficiently if its stability is lower than that of sense
strand, while a low stability in the middle of the antisense strand facilitates
the mRNA cleavage.
However, these parameters seem
inadequate to predict also if the selected siRNAs compete to each other, in
that we found no clear relationship between them and competition. Titration
experiments by using exogenously added siRNAs have already indicated that the
efficacy of RNAi results from the equilibrium between the number of target mRNA
molecules produced by the transcription machinery and the number of molecules
that are effectively cleaved (Elbashir et al, 2002; Holen et al,
2002).
We reasoned that each
siRNA challenged against its own target should generate a specific
dose-response curve. This was true since we distinguished stronger (higher KD
values) from weaker (lower KD values) shRNA. We also demonstrated that shRNA
with similar dose-response curves can be assembled in a plasmid to give an
effective multi-gene knock-down.
A. shRNA expressing
plasmids
The position
of the siRNAs targeted against porcine genes (I, P, U and A siRNA) is
shown in Figure
1A. Plasmids expressing the shRNAs under the control of the H1-RNA
promoter (pI, pP, pU, pA pMCSpSUPER plasmids) are depicted in
Figure 1B. They were
constructed according to the procedure described in the legend of
Figure 4 (first-third
step).

Figure 1. Activity of shRNA
expressing plasmids. (A) Target genes involved in arterial restenosis
(Kopp and de Martin,
2004), location of target sequence and siRNA nicknames.
(B) Schematic representation
of the 300 bp siRNA expression cassettes. pMCSpSUPER plasmids expressing I
shRNA (pI), P shRNA (pP), U shRNA (pU) and A sRNA (pA) are depicted. The 600 bp
spacer is reported on the right. Arrows indicate the direction of
transcription. (C) Schematic representation of the reporter pEGFP-C1 hybrid
plasmids used for the EGFP knock-down reporter assay. Indicated fragments of
porcine genes were obtained by RT-PCR amplification from porcine coronary
smooth muscle cells and cloned downstream of EGFP open reading frame in
pEGFP-C1 plasmid. The forward primer contained a stop codon in order to ensure
correct translation of the EGFP protein (Poliseno et al,
2004). Dotted box: CMV promoter; light gray box: EGFP ORF; white box: pIGF-IR porcine gene fragment; dashed box:
pPDGF-Rb porcine gene
fragment; dark gray box: puPA porcine gene fragment; black box: an porcine gene
fragment.
B. Reporter genes
To assess shRNA activity against their respective
targets, we applied an already developed EGFP knock-down reporter
assay (Poliseno et al, 2004). Briefly, a fragment of the target gene obtained by
RT-PCR amplification from porcine coronary smooth muscle cells was cloned
downstream of the EGFP open reading frame in pEGFP-C1 plasmid. The forward
primer contained a stop codon in order to ensure translation of wt EGFP
protein. Any shRNA targeting the resulting hybrid transcript determines a
decrease in cellular fluorescence, which is then quantified by flow cytometry.
The hybrid plasmids used as targets in the EGFP knock-down reporter assay are
reported in Figure 1C.
C. Recipient
cells and transfection
HEK293T human embryonic kidney cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) +10% Fetal Bovine serum
(FBS) at 37°C in a humified atmosphere containing 6%
CO2.
The cells to be transfected were seeded at a density of 6x105
cells/30-mm dish. After 24h, 40 pM hybrid plasmids were cotransfected in
HEK293T cells with the indicated amounts of the appropriate shRNA expressing
plasmid using Polyfect (Quiagen, Hilden,D) according to manufacturer's
recommendations. At 36 h post transfection, fluorescence was measured by flow
cytometry (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson, San Josč, CA) using 104
cells per sample.
D. Northern
blotting
The pI, pP and pIP plasmids (40 pM) were transfected
into HEK293T cells, as reported above. After 3 days, total RNA was extracted an
analyzed by Northern blotting according to an established procedure
(Czauderna et al, 2003). [32P]-5'-end-labelled ssDNA
oligonucleotides probes were used to detect hairpin I siRNA
(5'-tctcttgaaggaaatgacagttctctcc-3'), and P siRNA
(5'-tctcttgaagtcgcagatcttgaccagc-3'). Cellular tRNAVal
(5'-gaacgtgataaccactacactacggaaac-3') was used as a control. After
PhosphoImager
scanning, quantification of the radioactive bands was performed using OptiQuant
Acquisition and Analysis software.
III.
Results
A. Dose
response curves of shRNA-expressing plasmids
We tested
the dose-response effect of different concentrations of the four single-copy
shRNA-expressing plasmids against a fixed concentration of their respective
targets. We observed that the maximal activity was reached at ~8 pM for all the
four plasmids. It corresponded to a 83.9, 89.2, 78.2 and 84.2% decrease of EGFP
fluorescence for pI, pP, pU and pA respectively (Figure 2).
Of interest, when analyzing the
relative efficiencies of the four plasmids at lower concentrations, we observed
that KD (the concentration at which 50% of the maximal activity of each plasmid
was obtained) was 1.73, 2.19, 2.40 and 6.11 pM for pP, pI, pU and pA
respectively (insert of Figure 2). These results highlight that each
shRNA reached the highest acitivity (as evaluated from the plateau phase) with
different kinetics (as evaluated from KD).
B. Competition between shRNAs
The efficacy of the mono-specific
plasmids against their targets in the presence of saturating amounts of all the
other siRNA-expressing plasmids is shown in Figure 3. The activity of pI
against pIGF-IR reporter gene was reduced by 19% by pP, by 23% by pU and by
24% by pA. The activity of pP against its pPDGF-Rβ reporter gene was almost
unaffected by the co-transfection of any of the

Figure
2. Dose
response curves. 40pM hybrid plasmids were cotransfected in HEK293T cells with the
indicated amounts of pI (z,-), pP (=,ααα), pU (<,-) and pA (ą,--) plasmids. The mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments is
reported. The 1 to 8pM concentration range is expanded in the
inserted graph.

Figure
3. Effects of competition among the different shRNA-expressing
plasmids. Each shRNA expressing
plasmid (160 pM) was transfected into HEK293T cells with its EGFP hybrid
reporter plasmid (40 pM) and with each of the other shRNA expressing plasmids
(160 pM). The intensity of cellular EGFP fluorescence was measured at 36 h
after transfection. The results are expressed in percentage relative to the
fluorescence of cells transfected with the each of the reporter-effector pair
together with empty pMCSpSUPER plasmid.
other siRNA plasmids. Most notably, however, the activity of
pU (puPA reporter gene) was
reduced by 54% and that of pA (pan reporter gene) was virtually abolished by the simultaneous
expression of pI or pP. Taken all the combinations of Figure
3, the results clearly
indicate that "stronger" siRNAs (pP and pI) work at the detriment of "weaker"
ones (pU and pA).
C. Construction and validation of bispecific shRNAs
vector
As the order of KD values correlates
with the hyerarchy established by
the competition experiments, we assembled pP and pI with the expectation that
transcripts of the bi-specific pIP plasmid should be still active in achieving
optimal gene knock-down of target mRNA. Hence, we started out by adapting the
cassette multimerization procedure of Robinett (Robinett et al,
1996) to the construction of the bi-specific plasmid
pIP (Figure
5A),
which derives from the assembly of pI and pP. The procedure is described in the
legend of Figure 4. To demonstrate that the bi-specific plasmid is able to
simultaneously deliver transcriptionally active shRNAs genes, we measured the
expression of shRNAs and their efficiency to knock-down the reporter gene when
expressed from both the single-copy and the multi-copy plasmid. We observed
that the P shRNA and the I shRNA were transcribed from the 1-copy and the
2-copy plasmids at comparable level (Figure 5B) and that trascripts from the
2-copy plasmid were as effective as those from the one-copy plasmids to
knock-down EGFP expression (Figure 5C).
IV.
Discussion
Short
interfering
RNAs are successfully employed to knock-down gene expression for both
functional genomics and therapeutic purposes. The possibility to construct
vectors for the expression of siRNAs targeted against more than one gene would
be a further challenge in RNAi applications. All the isoforms of the same gene
or a cluster of genes involved in the same pathway could be knocked-down at
once, with a conceivable increase in efficiency, especially in the study of
complex signal transduction cascades and in the therapy of multifactorial
diseases. This implies that to construct a multi-shRNA expression plasmid, the
knowledge whether the selected siRNAs compete or not to each other is
crucial.
In this work, we considered four
genes the simultaneous downregulation of which would be beneficial for the
prevention of restenosis.
Using the knock-down of the EGFP reporter gene, we determined dose
response curves of shRNA expressing plasmids against their own target genes.
From each curve we derived the maximal activity and KD. By ordering activity
values (P>A>I>U) and KD values (P>I>U>A), it came out that
the two ranks are not coincident, indicating that KD accounts for some other
characteristic of siRNAs. Interestingly, the rank established by the
competition
experiments (P>I>U>A) well correlated with that of KD values
(P>I>U>A), so that stronger shRNAs were those with lower KD (pP =
1.73pM and pI =2.19 pM), whereas weaker siRNAs were those with higher KD (pU =
2.40pM and pA = 6.11pM). All together these findings indicate that shRNA with
very close KD values can be used for the simultaneous expression inside cells.
Indeed, when we assembled pP and pI to construct the bi-specific plasmid pPI,
it resulted that both cassettes were transcribed and that the transcripts were
comparably active. This indicates the feasibility of the multi-copy shRNA
cassette delivery approach and its efficacy in achieving optimal knockdown
efficiency.

Figure
4. Construction of a multi-shRNA expressing plasmid. Schematic representation of the strategy used to
construct the bi-specific pIP plasmid. First Step: Cloning of the pSUPER expression cassette
(Brummelkamp et al, 2002) into the pMCS'3 plasmid using Eco RI and Sal I
restriction sites, to obtain pMCSpSUPER plasmid. pMCS'3 contains a multiple
cloning site (MCS) flanked by Not I restriction sites in the pCMV-MCS backbone
(Stratagene). Second Step: Cloning
of the 600 bp spacer. An irrelevant 600 bp DNA PCR product, containing
restriction sites for Sal I at one end and for Xho I and Bam HI at the other
end, was cloned into pMCSpSUPER using the Sal I and Bam HI restriction sites.
Sal I and Xho I restriction products are compatible for ligation and
reconstitute a site that cannot be re-cut by either enzyme. As a consequence,
both Sal I and Xho I are maintained as unique sites within the spaced
pMCSpSUPER
plasmid. Third Step: Cloning of the
hairpin I siRNA and P siRNA sequence into the pSUPER cassette of spaced
pMCSpSUPER, to obtain pI and pP, respectively. Fourth Step: The pP cassette was extracted using the Sal I and Bam
HI restriction sites and cloned into the pI plasmid by using the Xho I and Bam
HI restriction sites. The fourth step can be repeated, each time leading to the
duplication of the number of the shRNA cassettes contained within the pMCS'3
plasmid. For all cloning steps, the recA-
E. coli strain Stbl2 was used. By
using the Not I restriction sites in the MCS, an insert containing all the
shRNA cassettes can be easily extracted and cloned into any other suitable
vector for in vivo transduction. White box: 300 bp pSUPER expression cassette; dark
gray box: hairpin I siRNA sequence; light gray box: hairpin P siRNA sequence;
dashed box: 600 bp spacer.

Figure
5. Multi-specific multi-shRNA plasmid transcription and activity. (A)
Schematic representation
of the bi-specific pIP plasmid. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription.
(B)
Northern blot of hairpin I and P siRNA transcripts. HEK293T cells were
transfected with 450 pM of the
mono-specific pI and pP and the bi-specific pIP
plasmid. After three days, total RNA was extracted and analyzed by
northern blotting. A representative experiment of three is reported.
(C) 40pM hybrid
pIGF-IR (upper part) or pPDGF-Rb (lower part) reporter plasmid were cotransfected into HEK293T cells
with their respective mono-specific shRNA plasmid or with the bi-specific pIP
shRNA plasmid (160 pM). Cellular fluorescence was evaluated 36 h after
transfection. The values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments and
represent the reduction in fluorescence expressed in percentage relative to the
cells transfected with the mono-specific shRNA expressing
plasmid.
In conclusion, this work demonstrates that KD accounts
for the competition between siRNAs and that expression cassettes for different
shRNAs can be efficiently and rapidly assembled into a multi-specific
multi-shRNA plasmids. A practical correlate of these observations is that, in
order to obtain effective multi-gene knock-down, only siRNAs with similar
inhibitory kinetic need to be delivered into
cells. The goal of selecting such siRNAs can be easily met by the systematic
analysis of their dose-response curves.
Anderson J,
Banerjea A, Akkina R (2003)
Bispecific short hairpin siRNA constructs targeted to CD4, CXCR4, and CCR5
confer HIV-1 resistance. Oligonucleotides 13, 303-312.
Brummelkamp TR,
Bernards R, Agami R (2002) Stable
suppression of tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference. Cancer
Cell 2, 243-247.
Czauderna F,
Fechtner M, Aygun H, Arnold W, Klippel A, Giese K, Kaufmann J
(2003) Functional studies of the PI(3)-kinase signalling
pathway employing synthetic and expressed siRNA. Nucleic Acids
Res 31, 670-682.
Elbashir SM,
Harborth J, Weber K, Tuschl T (2002)
Analysis of gene function in somatic mammalian cells using small interfering
RNAs. Methods 26,
199-213.
Holen T,
Amarzguioui M, Wiiger MT, Babaie E, Prydz H (2002) Positional effects of short interfering RNAs
targeting the human coagulation trigger Tissue Factor. Nucleic
Acids Res 30, 1757-1766.
Hsieh AC, Bo
R, Manola J, Vazquez F, Bare O, Khvorova A, Scaringe S, Sellers WR
(2004) A library of siRNA duplexes targeting the
phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway: determinants of gene silencing for use in
cell-based screens. Nucleic Acids Res
32, 893-901.
Kawasaki H,
Suyama E, Iyo M, Taira K (2003)
siRNAs generated by recombinant human Dicer induce specific and significant but
target site-independent gene silencing in human cells. Nucleic
Acids Res 31, 981-987.
Khvorova A,
Reynolds A, Jayasena SD (2003)
Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias.Cell 115, 209-216.
Kopp CW, de
Martin R (2004) Gene therapy
approaches for the prevention of restenosis. Curr Vasc
Pharmacol 2, 183-189.
Leirdal M,
Sioud M (2002) Gene silencing in
mammalian cells by preformed small RNA duplexes. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun 295, 744-748.
McManus MT,
Haines BB, Dillon CP, Whitehurst CE, van Parijs L, Chen J, Sharp PA
(2002) Small interfering RNA-mediated gene silencing in T
lymphocytes. J Immunol 169,
5754-5760.
Poliseno L,
Evangelista M, Mercatanti A, Mariani L, Citti L, Rainaldi G
(2004) The energy profiling of short interfering RNAs is
highly predictive of their activity. Oligonucleotides 14, 227-232.
Robinett CC,
Straight A, Li G, Willhelm C, Sudlow G, Murray A, Belmont AS
(1996) In vivo localization of DNA sequences and
visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac
operator/repressor recognition. J Cell Biol 135, 1685-1700.
Schuck S,
Manninen A, Honsho M, Fullekrug J, Simons K (2004) Generation of single and double knockdowns in
polarized epithelial cells by retrovirus-mediated RNA interference. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 101,
4912-4917.
Schwarz DS,
Hutvagner G, Du T, Xu Z, Aronin N, Zamore PD (2003) Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex.
Cell 115,
199-208.
Wunsche W,
Sczakiel G (2005) The activity of
siRNA in mammalian cells is related to the kinetics of siRNA-target recognition
in vitro: mechanistic implications.
J Mol Biol 345,
203-209.
Yu JY, Taylor J, DeRuiter SL, Vojtek
AB, Turner DL (2003)
Simultaneous inhibition of GSK3a and GSK3b using hairpin siRNA expression
vectors. Mol Ther
7, 228-236.